Depot vs WarpBuild Comparison - 2025 May

19 May 202522 minute read

Depot provides Github Actions runners that you can start using by just changing one line in the Github actions workflow file. This post provides a detailed comparison between Depot and WarpBuild to help you make an informed decision.

Check out the live benchmark comparison between WarpBuild and Depot here.

Feature Comparison

FeatureDepotWarpBuildWarpBuild Advantage
CPU: x86-64AMD EPYC m7ax86-64 (Desktop Class Ryzen 7950X3D)WarpBuild is 40% more powerful than Depot for the same price
CPU: arm64AWS Graviton 4AWS Graviton 4Depot is 33% more expensive for the same performance;
MacOS hardwareM2 Pro (8vcpu) 24GB RAMM4 Pro (6 vcpu) 24GB RAMWarpBuild jobs are ~20% faster
OS SupportUbuntu 22.04, 24.04; MacOS 14; Windows Server 2022Ubuntu 22.04, 24.04, MacOS 13/14/15 with M4 Pro, Windows Server 2022Latest Linux, MacOS, Windows, custom images
Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC)Enterprise plan and AWS onlySelf-serve on AWS, GCP, AzureCloud-hosted control plane with runners in user's cloud account. Provides maximum flexibility, zero management overhead, and does not require an Enterprise Plan.
InfrastructureRegion info unavailableCloud (EU), BYOC (AWS, GCP, Azure any region)Multiple providers/regions, reduced data transfer costs, and BYOC for improved security
Remote Docker BuilderMulti-arch, limited concurrencyMulti-arch higher concurrencyWarpBuild spins up multiple instances in parallel for concurrent builds while Depot runs parallel builds on the same instance causing slow-down. WarpBuild also provides a multi-arch docker builder cloud.
SSO supportAvailableAvailableWarpBuild supports SSO with direct integrations for Microsoft Entra ID, Google, Okta, Auth0, JumpCloud etc.
Static IPsNoAvailable at no cost (BYOC only)
SnapshotsNot availableAvailableSave and restore runner state for persistence and incremental builds. Provides 10x improvement in build times by eliminating dependency installation time.
CachingUnlimitedUnlimited; 7-day retention;-
Advanced DashboardRicher dashboardRich dashboardDepot has estimated analytics on time saved by builds and docker layer explorer. WarpBuild does not.
Dedicated Cache ActionsNoYesWarpBuild provides framework specific cache actions to speed up builds.
ComplianceSOC2 Type2SOC2 Type2
Fast bootInstances on Standby for fast bootInstances on standby for fast boot even on BYOC.Extremely valuable, especially for Windows isntances and larger instance types
PricingFixed subscription of $200/month beyond usageNo subscription required, pay as you go.

Depot WarpBuild Cache

WarpBuild Dashboard

WarpBuild Analytics

Conclusion

WarpBuild's x86-64 runners are much faster than Depot's runners while the arm64 runners are similar in performance but cheaper. Overall, WarpBuild is cheaper and fully usage based without any subscription fees. WarpBuild also provides MacOS M4 Pro hardware for faster builds.

For enterprises, WarpBuild delivers fully customizable BYOC options, SSO, snapshots, better security, and more customization at a fraction of the cost (~5x cheaper compared to Depot).

Get Started Today

WarpBuild is committed to providing you with the tools you need to build faster, smarter, and more cost-effectively. Join us in this new era of development.


For detailed technical documentation, visit WarpBuild Docs. For any errors in this post, please contact us at [email protected].


Previous post

BuildJet vs WarpBuild Comparison - 2025 May

19 May 2025
GitHubGithub Actions Runners